The trial of Johnny Depp and Amber: From another perspective

The case of Johnny Depp and Amber. And that occupied social networking sites, we will deal with them today from an educational point of view through the course of the experiment. The story and the famous trial began in 2012 when a cinematic work brought them together. Famous actor Johnny Depp, the hero of the series Pirates of the Caribbean, fell in love with actress Amber Heard, and they got married at the beginning of 2015.

The trial of Johnny Depp and Amber

After 15 months, we announced the divorce, and the quarrels, scandals, defamation, and issues began between them until we reached the last trial, which was followed by a large audience around the world as if it was one of the thrillers and suspense of production. Hollywood.

But what concerns us here in this article is the administration of the trial and its protocols, the amount of freedom and democracy in it, and the lessons learned from it. As if this trial was broadcast to the world for the Americans to say: These are the origins of litigation. Learn from us, O others.

Indeed, we will try to analyze the trial from this aspect, and I mean here the aspect of managing litigation in a wonderful way.

First: the courtroom - the case of Johnny Depp and Amber

The courtroom is organized and equipped with all the technological means that assist in presenting evidence, whether audio or video (videos).

Because if such equipment is not available in any courtroom, this means wasting the opportunity of both the litigants and the court body to see the evidence in a legitimate way. This may cause injustice to one of the parties to the conflict.

Second: The administration of the trial by the judge or judges

Third: Lawyers and their role in settling this trial in favor of Johnny Depp.

Johnny Depp's lawyer was so clever that she used all her photos and videos to accurately and systematically prove that Amber Heard had lied in her claim that Johnny Depp was beating her. All this without the lawyer attacking Amber in a way that raises her nerves or gives her lawyer the right to object to the questions.

Although Amber answers the questions, she appears to be well trained by her lawyer. But lying does not have the power to stand in front of the truth if it is supported by various evidence such as pictures, audio, and videos.

Fourth: The litigants - Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Actor Johnny Depp and Amber Heard committed to respecting each other during the trial. Despite all the scandalous evidence and defamation that appeared before and during the trial.

But here I am talking about the course of the trial itself, and nothing else of those scandals concerns us.

conclusion:

Although the behavior of American society has its own privacy. What is permissible for them is not permissible nor permissible in our societies. But this does not prevent us from learning from them the positive aspects that help in the advancement and advancement of our societies.

The trial in all its aspects was a wonderful lesson for anyone who wants to learn the arts of a free and impartial judiciary. Thank you to those in charge of this case, from judges, lawyers, and even litigants.